Impact of International Trade on the Environment

International hatful has a great potence to uplift the lives of people in developing countries as well as increasing profits for companies in the developed world. It domiciliate also receive environmental consequences if the transactions atomic number 18 non consciously provisioned. This potential can flourish when countries sum up to a common agreement on trade rectitudes that protect against the damages that using these products can bring upon the local community. Pesticide recitation for agriculture and disease control has been a controversial top of the inningic for decades give its toll on people and the environment.Its monitoring has been increasingly successful in industrial countries but almost non-existent in developing countries causing mischief to the wellness of thousands of farm workers around the world as they repeatedly come in contact with and inhale harmful chemicals. According to the Food and floriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), differe nt pesticides, when consumed, concur varying and inter-related entraps as they pass through the food chain. Therefore, the larger concentrations of pesticides are found on larger predators, including men.Among the damages to living organisms, including aquatic species, are cancers, tumors and lesions, reproductive forbidding or failure, suppression of immune system, disruption of endocrine system, cellular and desoxyribonucleic acid damage, physical deformities such as hooked beaks on birds, poor tip health marked by low red to white parentage cell ratio, and death. In virtually cases, chronic effects are passed from extension to generation and completely become apparent in time 1. The heady and rapidly spreading properties of toxic chemicals present in pesticides do not concern only the developing world.Some, including PCBs can originate in India and tug the wind to the Arctic in just 5 days 2. The FAOs research discovered that in the Great Lakes of North America bioaccum ulation (or stool of a chemical from the surrounding medium into an organism) and magnification of chlorinated compounds in what is, on global standards, a relatively clean aquatic system, caused the disappearance of top predators such as eagle and mink and deformities in several species of aquatic birds 3.In recognition of the disadvantages many harmful pesticides such as DDT confirm been banned in the United States, yet their manufacture for exportation is lock away permitted. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates the imports and exports of these products in an effort to prevent health and contamination issues as well as to supervise fair competition. The law requires that exporters of unregistered (or unapproved) pesticides first obtain a statement signed by the foreign purchaser indicating the purchasers awareness of that product in the U. S 4.Despite this awareness, some countries continue to use them because it is an inexpensive way to keep their crops blemish -free and fight diseases the like malaria, for example. In tropical and subtropical regions, in addition to pesticides used in the normal course of irrigated agriculture, control of vector-borne diseases may require additional action of insecticides such as DDT which have serious and widespread bionomic consequences 5. Such large demand in countries with endangered eco-systems like brazil has lured many companies in industrial countries to keep producing and exporting.More than 312 million kg were exported from the US in 1996, a 40% increase since 1992. Some even dismiss their production to third world countries where environmental regulations are far slight pruneive. In many past cases pesticide packages were exported without the proper disclosure of all chemicals, do it difficult to distinguish their consequences. This was especially unsafe for farmers in developing countries where protect equipment is scarce 6. Improvement is underway, but sometimes it also means victori ous a few steps backwards. Since the Rotterdam assembly on the Prior sure Consent (PIC), adopted in February 2004, the U.S. is also making an effort in sharing the responsible use of 39 hazardous chemicals listed by the Convention 7. Some developing countries followed on the initiative to ban or restrict hazardous pesticides for health and environmental reasons, yet this positive step towards declaration the situation has led to water contamination concerns. These countries lack the monetary resources to mighty store or dispose of about 100,000 tons they no long-run use, sometimes because they have deteriorated in storage. Drums are unbroken exposed to temperateness and rain running the risk of bursting open or leaking.Some are kept near markets contaminating the soil, groundwater, drinking water, and irrigation. In efforts to decrease their stocks some countries have opted to donate them in foreign aid programs. Far from resolving the problem, this only moves it elsewhere. S olutions seem farfetched for the developing world since FAO estimates it would cost $80-100 million in Africa alone to dispose of them appropriately 8. EPAs law to allow exporting banned pesticides is greatly flawed because these harmful chemicals return on merchandise food, wind currents and rain or snow.Despite efforts to regulate the tolerable chemical balance wheel on imported foods, as long as toxic chemicals are still manufactured the global environment and public health testament continue to deteriorate. Unfortunately, environmental legislation usually takes years to take effect and is mostly driven by business interests. A sensible theme would be to radically eliminate the use of these chemicals globally and replace them with graphic ingredients and green technology.