Wednesday, February 20, 2019
Managing for Organizational Integrity Essay
This article by Lynn Sharp Paine addresses the necessary and often  miss relationship between  line of work management and ethical motive. With most managers focused on bottom line results, the concept of ethics is often lost in rushed daily  decisions or is  non considered at  each(prenominal). But as the article suggests, a clear commitment to integrity-based management  give the sack  non only avoid unnecessary  sub judice complications in the courts  scarcely  bear strengthen business operations in times of stress and uncertainty,  on the nose the occasions where ethics are tested by exigent circumstances. nearly CEOs and business models concentrate their ethics evaluations on the most obvious separate of the organization, such as departments like compensation committees where individuals with poor integrity  butt joint cause great harm. However, greater attention should be placed to all parts of the organization from executive management down to the retail  sales floor. As was     noned during the analysis of the Beech-Nut apple juice  drive study,  numerous individuals within the organization knew of substantial problems with the product but were afraid of  cosmos considered Chicken Littles if concerns were raised within the  sloshed. The subsequent legal settlements and damage to the  news report of the  family only reinforces the rule that ethics should be universally viewed as important within all parts of the organization chain and not merely a quaint or outdated theoretical consideration.The  example of an integrity compliance program  brooknot merely ask the simple  misgiving If its legal, its  honest and move on. Many professional actions and business procedures are lawful but not in the companys best interests to perform since they are viewed as either unhonorable or intentionally negligent. An excellent illustration of this principle in action is the Solomon Brothers  type study outlined in the text where four top officials of the firm failed to rep   ort wrongdoing by others. There was no law, regulation, or  sexual company policy that required this disclosure, suggesting that the behavior itself was not considered unethical in any way by society, the legislature, or even the firms own ethics committee.Nevertheless, the actions were considered as such by theinvesting  semi public and the Wall Street community that penalized the firm for its inaction in the  facial expression of mis stockpile. This case sets a clear standard that relying upon written ethics policies does not provide a clear safe harbor in case of potential misconduct. Put another way, just because an action is not expressly unethical according to some objective guide or  footfall does not make any specific behavior either ethical or even correct.An ethics compliance plan sounds like a reasonable solution to the problem of business ethics, but the issues are not that simple to solve with merely a boards  inspection of potential conflicts. Legal compliance, of cour   se, is not the issue since all firms must  watch over with the law. A standard of ethical compliance suggests there is one ethical standard by which one can comply, a fact that is   more true in the exception than the rule. A personal commitment to the highest ethics possible by visible business leaders and managers certainly is a prerequisite to any compliance plan. Another important goal should be the integration of ethics into the daily business model as seamlessly as possible to make these rules a constant reminder, in other words, not some distant academic rule to be avoided if possible but a clear path that guides retail decisions at all levels of the organization.A commitment to ethics management within a firm can reduce internal criminal misconduct and also provide a company with an added boost of public confidence and reliability. Moving away from lawyers  make ethics decisions to having them assist in the formation of ethics consistent with legal practice is a superior sol   ution because it changes the scope of the business decision process. By concentrating on ethics instead of legality makes the decision-making process fuzzier and more cumbersome since ethics are subjective and not bright  aerial tested like most statutes which clearly delineate acceptable conduct from illegal ones.But a focus on ethics, especially through and through a visible and vocally supported ethics compliance program, can broaden the executive decision-making process from what is merely legal to what is  object lessonly correct. The public (and all judges and juries) expect business executives to have higher moral considerations that what is legal or what is not prohibited in a company employee handbook.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.